Two-way door, low cost. Can be undone easily. Ordering supplies, trying a new email subject line, rearranging a schedule.
Time: minutes
DOSSIER · The system
Good owners aren't people who never make bad calls. They're people who make decisions the same careful way every time, keep a record, and learn from it. Anyone can learn to decide this way. This page shows you how.
Instinct works when you've seen a situation hundreds of times and got quick, clear feedback. Most owner decisions aren't like that. You hire a few times a year, set prices once or twice, and choose a direction even less often. You don't get enough repetitions for instinct to become reliable.
A system fills that gap in three ways. It makes you consistent, so mood and pressure matter less. It makes your thinking visible, so you and others can check it. And it leaves a record, so a year later you can see whether your reasoning was good or you just got lucky.
That record is the dossier: a one-page file for each important decision. Over time your dossiers become the most valuable document in your business, a history of how you think.
■ Triage first
Before you open a file, decide how big the case is. This keeps you from spending a week on a two-minute choice, or two minutes on a choice that could sink the company. You'll see these class labels throughout the site.
Two-way door, low cost. Can be undone easily. Ordering supplies, trying a new email subject line, rearranging a schedule.
Time: minutes
Costly but reversible. Mistakes hurt but can be fixed. A price change, a new tool, a part-time hire, a marketing push.
Time: an hour or two
One-way door. Hard or impossible to undo. Firing someone, signing a long lease, taking on debt, dropping a major client, a partnership.
Time: days, plus a second opinion
■ The seven steps
Most bad decisions start as the wrong question. "Should I fire Alex?" is narrower than "How do I get reliable work done in this role?" Chip and Dan Heath, in their book Decisive, warn about "whether or not" questions because they hide the other options. Rewrite your question until it leaves room for at least two real choices.
Two moves. First, describe the situation in the third person, using your name, so your ego steps back (covered in Third Person). Second, check the base rate: how do decisions like this usually turn out for people in general? Psychologist Daniel Kahneman called this the outside view. Your plan always feels special from the inside. The base rate tells you how often plans like it actually work.
Put everything you know into facts, assumptions and guesses (see What-If First). Then find your shakiest assumption, the one that would change the decision if it were wrong, and look for the cheapest way to test it before you commit. One phone call or a small trial often beats a week of thinking.
For your leading option, write the best case, worst case and most likely case. Then ask "and then what?" once more. Then run a premortem: assume it failed a year from now and write down why. The key test is survivability. If the worst case would end the business, you need a backup plan or a smaller first step, however unlikely the worst case seems.
Now question your favorite option like a suspect (see No Yes Man). Write the strongest case against it, ask what would have to be true for it to work, and for Class III cases, get a second person to attack it. If you can't argue the other side well, you don't understand the decision yet.
Make the call. You won't have every piece of information, and that's normal (see Tough Calls for the 70% rule). Then set tripwires, an idea the Heath brothers also describe: signals you choose now that will force you to rethink later. "If we haven't signed three new clients by March 1, we stop the ad spend." Tripwires protect you from sticking with a bad call because you've already invested in it. Last, tell the people affected clearly. How you explain a decision decides how well it gets carried out. For how to say it, see Clear at Work.
Every dossier gets a review date. When it comes, compare what happened with what you expected and grade the decision. Poker player and author Annie Duke calls the common mistake "resulting": judging a decision only by its outcome. A good decision can have a bad result, and a bad decision can get lucky. The Decision Quality Grid below separates the two.
R · Review tool
At review time, place the decision in one square. Over many dossiers, this tells you whether you have a thinking problem or just bad luck.
■ The artifact
This is the deliverable of the whole method: one page, every step covered, readable in two minutes. This example is a Class II decision for a small bookkeeping firm.
Options: hire full-time, hire part-time contractor, buy software, do nothing. Decide by Dec 1. Success: owner under 45 hours a week by March.
"A new owner would get help now." Many small firms hire too early and struggle with payroll, so a trial is safer.
Fact: turned down 6 clients in 3 months. Shakiest assumption: that I can delegate well. Not yet tested.
Best: capacity doubles. Worst: salary with no new work. Likely: slow 2 months, then gains. Premortem: "I never trained them properly."
Against: full-time locks in cost before delegation is proven. Reviewed by a mentor.
Hire a 90-day contractor. Tripwire: if I'm not saving 8 hours a week by week 6, stop and rethink.
Outcome: to be filled in · Grid grade: to be filled in · Lesson: to be filled in
Fill it in on screen or print it. Includes the case classes, all seven steps and the Decision Quality Grid.
Ready? Open your first file in the Dossier Builder.